distribution

the hunger games catching fire was distributed by Warner bros.
shaun of the dead was distributed by universal pictures

vertical integration:
one media conglomerate owns or oversees production, distribution, exhibition

the process of distribution is a very lengthy a detailed process that crucially dictates the success of afilm through strategic release dates, mrakerting and finnally distribution

ill manors notes/case study

producers:
revolver
film london microwave
lottery funded
bbc films
aim image
plan b enterprises


film notes:
drug use and dealing
black berry
blocks
stolen phones
women in underwear
police brutality
crack houses/ drug houses
sex
pregnant heroine addict 
kids growing up to be dealers
gang leaders
police harasing people for no reason
steriotypical youth
older people forceing things on younger people
doing unnessasary dangerous things
kids being exposed to things they arent suposed to
prostituteing
people having dark pasts
guns are power
extreme peer presure
still some good people wraped up in gang
endless cycle of kids growing up to kill people and geting killed them selfs, but also drugs, violence, sex and death
hore houses
when it really matters evan the people who you think are the worst have a concience

representaion essay london riots

Kai Harvey

London riots 2011 representation essay

In the London riots youth was represented as dangerous in the media and are criticized and looked down apron for the minority action and this was caused by the media mainly publicizing.

Most of the images the media showed youths only wearing hoodies, tracksuits and balaclavas or masks and carrying weapons which presents all youths that wear hoodies and tracksuits as vile criminals. Now when youths wear hoodies people around them make the assumption that they are hiding their face to commit a crime when most youths wear it for fashion.by only publicising youths in this type of clothing with weapons and committing heinous acts influences the public opinions greatly on youths and what they are like. This ideology was still in place before the riots which separated the youths and the community was one thing and the youth community was another and this separation could be argued to be the cause of the riots and to continue to do this is not logical in any way  

As well as labelling criminals by the way they dress they also described youths as feral, despicable and without morals which allows the rest of society to think these things when they see a youth on the street and has greatly set back and lowed the opinion of all youths over London, by only publicizing the minority of youths that are like they say and did not publicise the youths that helped clean up the community and the youths that went out to protect their area from being badly damaged. The Medias use of feral describes the youth as animalistic that have rejected societal norms. This description shows that they have become wild and the sophisticated society that we are widely used to means nothing to them. The media also used despicable which backs up my point on feral as the use of despicable is usually used when someone is describing an action or actions that will never be accepted by our current society, as you can see there is a running theme with the terminology that the media is using which separates the youth from the rest one society which is said to one of the causes of the riots in the first place.

Throughout the riots news broadcasts were repeatedly showing majority youth violence which further pushes through my point that the media portrays youth as the majority of criminals and like I said above that they didn’t document the good things youths were doing not nearly as much as the bad thing that were going on, furthermore the also edit the broadcasts in a way that makes youths come from a gritty back ground and this is shown through the interviews taken with young people the background was almost always graffiti or a dirty looking street where as the news reporters covering the story had nice scenery like the sun hitting the trees as their background that suggests that they are more civilised than the nation’s youths.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2024284/UK-riots-2011-Liberal-dogma-spawned-generation-brutalised-youths.html

after reading this article it shows that there are truly higher or middle class people who have conceited views on youths by saying that they have no authority or education, are an "absolute dead weight to society", "we only have loyalty to our local gangs" and "we have only animal instincts that respond only to eating, sleeping, having sex and destroying any accessible property that belongs to others". it is this view that again separates the apparent "amoral and brutalised sub culture of youths" today and it is this separation that causes a rift between us and the rest of sociaty. if we are forever labelled as this we can never feel as an equal and respected member of society. the reason for them to continues to push this seperation is that they only pay attension to the minorty of youths do have no education and act stupidly but thier is a minorty of adults that commit fraud and more seroius crimes but we dont label all adults to be criminals.This article and many like it give off the impression that they think they are of a higher status than youths and that we youths are less human than they are based of thier repeted use of words like "feral", "beast like" and "animalistic" which discourages people both adults and youth alike to communicate and break down the communication barrier that has been built by views like this one

In conclusion the media represented youths as animals that were separate from society, like I said above that this very ideology could be the basis on which the riots started. This helps my argument that it was the youth separation from society and the fear of youth violence was the cause of the 2011 London riots